sole trader or limited company ?
ssomanat started this topic @ 10:40 on 06/11/2009
Hi Experts,
Iam planning to set up a small-scale business which involves importing goods from other countries. After reading a lot through various info sites on starting up new businees iam up against one question which iam bit confused about.
I would like to run the business on my own from my home (not planning to employ others )
I understand that if i register my company as sole trader the risk might be high since the liability is not limited and can also put even ur personal assets at risk. Then i come across the private limited company option where the liability is limited. But then i would need to register at company house , allocate specific salary to me (MD) , show returns etc etc. So...
1) Are there good insurances in place which can protect sole traders in the worst case of financial trouble/ disputes etc so that their assets are not at risk ? I know there might be many sole traders here, so maybe you guys can throw some light ?
2) Or If i register as limited company.would i be able to use the company profits for my own personal purpose ? would i be allowed to run the company from my home ?
Guess there questions gives a good idea of the types of queries that i as a newbie to business have. All suggestions welcome , even if it covers other related topics.
Many thanks for all your help...
Interesting or important topic? Please click "vote topic higher" if you think so.
RE: sole trader or limited company ?
HowAssociates | 06/11/2009 04:16 PM
Hi
I have set up a limited company registered at my home address. You cant just use the money for your own purposes you have to pay yourself a salary and dividends and then use that as you wish. Setting up a ltd company is really easy as there are no end of companies and accountants that will do it for a small fee. My guess would be that sole trader insurance would be costly but as a limited company I have employer, employee and public liabilty insurance and it all costs arond £60 a month
------------------------
---------------------------------
Richard How FIAP MAPM
How Associates - Programme Management Consultants
Quality Web Hosting
Photography Forum
Tourist Guide to Newport Pagnell
RE: sole trader or limited company ?
fastfences | 06/11/2009 08:22 PM
I am of the view that from a trader and customer perception, the Limited company is always the best vehicle for credibility. I understand both can go broke, be rogues, etc, etc, but in business perception and credibility are great assets.
Sure, there is a bit more paperwork and reporting requirements, but in the final analysis, not very much more than that of a sole trader.
One other minor point is that after registering a ltd co. name with Companies House, that particular name is 'somewhat' protected, whereas as a sole trader's John Smith trading as 'Eastern Imports' - Eastern Imports is not neccessarily protected.
To further Richard's advice above, he may have scared you a little with his £60 per month insurance overhead. You may not need employee insurance, though I would seek professional advice on this because you may be deemed to be an employee. Similarly with Public Liability. If you have no clients/traders attending your property, you would not need the liability insurance.
Cheers,
Nigel
------------------------
Startups Awards finalist 2005.
RE: sole trader or limited company ?
ssomanat | 09/11/2009 11:21 AM
Thanks a lot guys.. U all have been very helpful..
RE: sole trader or limited company ?
jamescartwright | 09/11/2009 11:55 AM
I have written an article: http://www.squidoo.com/sole-trader-vs-limited-company which may help you to see which structure could be best for you.
Also Business Link can be helpful in explaining the general concepts of different structures: http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/layer?r.s=m&r.l1=1073858808&r.lc=en&r.l3=1073865730&r.l2=1073859215&topicId=1073865730&r.i=1073789606&r.t=RESOURCES
------------------------
UK Limited Company Formation - £24.99
RE: sole trader or limited company ?
DAAccountingServices | 14/11/2009 10:48 AM
Hi,
The limited company is a legal entity in its own right, so you are right in terms taking liabilities away from yourself directly, but as a company director you still have responsibilities, and in certain cases you can still be pursued personally for the company's liabilities.
You also have to think about the practicallites of running an import business. Presumably you will find it difficult to gain credit from suppliers abroad initially as the risk will be too high for them. In this case you will have to fund the business out of your own pocket or through a loan. Setting up a limited company means that the company will have no credit rating at the start, so the chances are you will need to borrow in your own name in the first instance anyway.
I would have thought in the first instance you should start as a sole trader, and as the business builds transfer it into a limited company as you will be risking your money anyway. The statutory and filing requirements for a sole trader are also less onerous than for a limited company.
I am working as an accountant, so if you need any other advice then please email me at DAAccountingServices@hotmail.co.uk.
Kind regards
Dom